![]() In other words, an intentional energetic imprint from a reality outside of our physical reality is recorded inside our physical reality. ![]() It would shift from the “miracle” of producing physical energy with means from another realm to the undiminished miracle of affecting the positioning and timing of numerous tiny airborne particles in a meaningful way that clearly defies the laws of statistics.Īs we hypothesize on the evidence at hand, we can see that the orb process begins with the consciousness of a sentient being outside of this world and ends as physical evidence on the image of a recording device. We believe that this explanation cannot be upheld for numerous reasons which we explain in our book, including an experiment where an orb was photographed under clean room conditions, where airborne particles of the size that could explain reflection effects could not have been present.Įven if reflection at airborne particles were the origin of orbs, the mysticism about evidence of nonhuman thought would be undiminished. ![]() They claim that they are merely reflections of airborne particles positioned in close vicinity of the camera’s lens. There are many critics who argue against the authenticity of orbs. Therefore, it is reasonable for us to argue that there is intent behind their showing. Orbs respond to requests to appear in photographs and will generally not bother showing up in photos when they anticipate their presence will not be noticed.To minimize the energetic requirement for being recorded by cameras, orbs focus their energy with laser-like accuracy into the camera rather than into other directions where there is no camera to capture them.Orbs appear to take the minute amount of physical energy required for being recorded in digital images from the camera flash. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |